Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with pwntools
Search options not deleted
user 31468
0
votes
1
answer
424
views
ret2libc: problem getting exploit work without pwntools
#include <stdio.h>
void vuln() {
char buffer[256];
gets(buffer);
}
int main() {
vuln();
return 0;
}
I am able to exploit the program with pwntools, but I am unable to exploit it doing … with open('myfile.txt', 'wb') as w:
w.write(payload)
P.sendline(payload)
P.interactive()
exit()
What is the difference from running pwntools and piping bytes into the program? …
- 33
1
vote
Accepted
ret2libc: problem getting exploit work without pwntools
It seems that I made two critical mistakes when I tried to use myfile.txt to exploit the binary.
When writing the exploit to the file I did NOT append \n to the payload. P.sendline() appends this to …
- 33