Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with buffer-overflow
Search options questions only
not deleted
user 21077
A classical programming bug that may lead to a possible security flaw in software. Exploitation of this bug is usually taking place either in the stack or in the heap.
4
votes
2
answers
2k
views
What could be the purpose of XORing esp with a global variable? (stack canary protection)
I am currently looking at a function inside a Win32 executable's main module. After allocating memory on the stack (sub esp) and saving some registers on the stack, the value of esp is XORed with a gl …
