When reverse engineering programs, I often find functions like the one below. This function in particular has a set of nested if/else blocks (pink boxes) which would typically be fairly easy to follow. When code executes at the blue box however, the code becomes messy and can take either of two independent code paths (purple or yellow). If the developer had used a function (or not used an inline function) for the purple or yellow code blocks, this code would be much easier to reverse engineer. As a function, I can rename and comment on the code block, and the overall program becomes easier to read.

My usual technique when I come across this kind of function is to apply colors to the code blocks like you see in the graph below. Is there a way for IDA to treat an arbitrary collection of code blocks as a function that is not called and/or are there better approaches to dealing with inline code and independent code blocks?

Large function

1 Answer 1


It sounds like what you need is node groups. Since the very first implementation (5.0) IDA's graph view allowed to group several nodes into one "super-node" with a custom title. Just select the nodes you want to group with Ctrl-click and choose "Group nodes" from the context menu.

For more info, see "Graph node groups" in IDA's help or online.

  • On a separate note, it would help to put your input on on-topic-ness/off-topic-ness here meta.reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/q/7/189
    – asheeshr
    Commented Mar 27, 2013 at 1:37
  • Which is probably off topic, my question or your answer?
    – amccormack
    Commented Mar 27, 2013 at 1:51
  • 1
    @amccormack The question, since it does not involve reverse engineering itself but "how to use an RE tool". But I guess we could make such questions on-topic. Please add your thoughts here.
    – Igor Skochinsky
    Commented Mar 27, 2013 at 1:54
  • 1
    @IgorSkochinsky: as much as I like (and as you know ;)) to point out that this shouldn't get too biased towards a particular tool, I think those questions should be on-topic. I added my "comment" there and hope many others will. Btw: you already live up to what I hope will be your position soon ;) ... also see: meta.reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/7
    – 0xC0000022L
    Commented Mar 27, 2013 at 16:55
  • 1
    @IgorSkochinsky: I'm not sure per-se, but on most SE sites it's frowned upon to simply post a link without quoting at least a vital part.
    – 0xC0000022L
    Commented Mar 27, 2013 at 16:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.