0

The game uses Unity3D engine, perhaps with a custom render pipeline. Reports have been made, it is not possible to disassemble it. How did they achieve that?

3
  • 1
    Which reports? Can you link to some?
    – nobody
    Jan 17 at 7:51
  • @nobody can you disprove first?
    – ivan866
    Jan 17 at 16:02
  • 4
    that's a rather spurious response. Disprove what? You made a claim, and the (legitimate) question was raised where the claim comes from. Given this was migrated to our site, I second the request. One of the first tasks a reverse engineer usually does is reconnaissance. And looking at those reports could provide first insights.
    – 0xC0000022L
    Jan 17 at 20:55
0

I'm not sure what do you mean by "custom render pipeline" and "not possible to disassemble it", but I quickly checked my steam version, and all I can find is the SteamStub. Once removed, the code is not obfuscated.

4
  • 2
    Perhaps you could outline what procedure you used to come to your conclusion.
    – 0xC0000022L
    Jan 17 at 20:56
  • and how does DRM Manager influence source code and game resources?
    – ivan866
    Jan 18 at 1:26
  • Most of (any?) games coming from Steam are packed with their solution. One way to quickly check that is the presence of a section named .bind. This link explains it better than me. The game doesn't use Unity3D, @ivan866 could you share your source?
    – wisk
    Jan 18 at 2:28
  • @wisk the source mentioned in question is a single comment on Steam community pages; the notion that it uses Unity3D is (perhaps erratically) extrapolated from the fact that its successor, 'INSIDE', uses it, which is stated on Wikipedia page
    – ivan866
    Jan 18 at 17:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.