2

I've recently become pretty fascinated with virtualization and retrieving original code from a randomly generated byte code, such as protectors like VMProtect/etc. But I can not get a grasp on how it would actually be done.

Although I have read a few writings to help understand virtualization better, even articles specifically written to target the protector I'm trying to devirtualize, I can not relate their articles to my own sample. There are discrepancies between the two which confuse me.

I made a small program that takes in a string input and outputs it, then added Virtualization to the function. First thing I notice is that the function now calls another function, and looks like it adds random junk instructions after the call. I also notice that it pushes 4 bytes onto the stack.

.vmp0:00440C0F 68 28 02 8E 51                          push    518E0228h
.vmp0:00440C14 E8 68 BB FC FF                          call    sub_40C781

Inside sub_40C781 I see it is pushing all registers on the stack and also the pushf instruction which pushes flags. Inbetween these pushes and main instructions, I can't help but notice pointless instructions inbetween, which is a little odd since I only specified Virtualization in protection. Anyway, the main valid instructions I managed to scavenge from the function called go as

push    ebp
push    ebx
push    ecx
push    esi
push    edi
pushf
push    edx
push    eax
mov     eax, 0
push    eax
mov     esi, [esp+24h+arg_0]
lea     esi, [esi+eax]
lea     esp, [esp-0C0h]

But from there, I'm not sure how to proceed. The rest of instructions past the last lea go as

.vmp0:0040E187                         loc_40E187:                             ; CODE XREF: .vmp0:00416516↓j
.vmp0:0040E187                                                                 ; .vmp0:loc_42E5EB↓j ...
.vmp0:0040E187 8B DE                                   mov     ebx, esi
.vmp0:0040E189 B8 00 00 00 00                          mov     eax, 0
.vmp0:0040E18E 0F BA F7 E7                             btr     edi, 0E7h ; 'ç'
.vmp0:0040E192 66 23 F8                                and     di, ax
.vmp0:0040E195 2B D8                                   sub     ebx, eax
.vmp0:0040E197
.vmp0:0040E197                         loc_40E197:                             ; DATA XREF: sub_40C781:loc_40E197↓o
.vmp0:0040E197 8D 3D 97 E1 40 00                       lea     edi, loc_40E197
.vmp0:0040E19D 66 0F A4 D0 09                          shld    ax, dx, 9
.vmp0:0040E1A2 C1 C8 49                                ror     eax, 49h
.vmp0:0040E1A5 81 EE 04 00 00 00                       sub     esi, 4
.vmp0:0040E1AB 0F A3 F8                                bt      eax, edi
.vmp0:0040E1AE 33 C6                                   xor     eax, esi
.vmp0:0040E1B0 C6 C4 27                                mov     ah, 27h ; '''
.vmp0:0040E1B3 8B 06                                   mov     eax, [esi]
.vmp0:0040E1B5 F9                                      stc
.vmp0:0040E1B6 F8                                      clc
.vmp0:0040E1B7 E9 79 12 05 00                          jmp     loc_45F435

But I can't see how this would be interpreting code and translating it to its x86 representation. From my understanding, esi is probably the VM's instruction ptr. loc_40E197 seems to be the instruction 'dispatcher' for lack of better words. But I can not get a grasp of the inner workings, esi seems to be decremented by 4 each loop, which I thought would be 1 instead.

Any insight on to how to proceed would be greatly appreciated.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.