Timeline for Is decompilation significantly more limited when performed on handwritten assembly?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2021 at 18:39 | vote | accept | Paul | ||
| Jun 16, 2021 at 18:34 | history | edited | Paul | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Clarified question
|
| Jun 16, 2021 at 18:11 | comment | added | Paul | Good question. Ultimately, what I mean is "significantly less helpful". In particular, is it significantly more likely to produce wrong output, in the sense of output that does not accurately reflect what the machine code does. | |
| Jun 13, 2021 at 4:12 | answer | added | julian♦ | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jun 12, 2021 at 8:30 | comment | added | user3840170 | What do you mean by ‘more limited’? | |
| Jun 12, 2021 at 1:02 | answer | added | R4444 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 11, 2021 at 21:20 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jun 18, 2021 at 3:07 | |||||
| Jun 11, 2021 at 20:21 | review | First posts | |||
| Jun 11, 2021 at 21:01 | |||||
| Jun 11, 2021 at 20:17 | comment | added | Paul | I have encountered cases where function calls are written in such a way that Ghidra's decompiler was unable to make much sense of them. | |
| Jun 11, 2021 at 20:16 | history | asked | Paul | CC BY-SA 4.0 |