Timeline for How do I interpret the mangled functions name?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2018 at 14:14 | vote | accept | G. Ramistella | ||
| Dec 30, 2018 at 11:14 | answer | added | Ian Cook | timeline score: 7 | |
| Dec 29, 2018 at 17:37 | comment | added | anx199 |
The _cido pointer equals to address of and [rax], eax, because IDA shows you data section as code section. It may however be a pointer to char, a table of ints, a pointer to pointer to pointer. That is, a pointer to almost anything.
|
|
| Dec 29, 2018 at 15:00 | comment | added | Igor Skochinsky♦ | Re your edit, it may be useful to post the demangled name to StackOverflow since it’s more of a programming question than RE per se | |
| Dec 29, 2018 at 14:47 | history | edited | G. Ramistella | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 349 characters in body
|
| Dec 29, 2018 at 0:13 | comment | added | Jongware |
.. Using the online demangler on your name results in the slightly bewildering j__std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char> > std::__1::operator+<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char> >(char const*, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char> > const&) – originally, probably some typedefs or classes or summink like that.
|
|
| Dec 29, 2018 at 0:09 | comment | added | Jongware | Possible duplicate of Wierd names in import table | |
| Dec 28, 2018 at 23:40 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 11, 2019 at 17:21 | |||||
| Dec 28, 2018 at 23:10 | history | edited | G. Ramistella | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Dec 28, 2018 at 21:20 | history | edited | G. Ramistella | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 299 characters in body
|
| Dec 28, 2018 at 21:15 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 28, 2018 at 23:20 | |||||
| Dec 28, 2018 at 21:11 | history | asked | G. Ramistella | CC BY-SA 4.0 |